Archive for January, 2009

Your Money Is Up For Grabs

Saturday, January 31st, 2009

Just a quick story on how vulnerable the money you have in your bank accounts might be, especially if you have an account with PNC Bank.

The Howard County Republican Club chose a new Treasurer in January as I have moved to another position within the Republican Party, so after three years of being Treasurer, it was time for me to sign over the Club’s account to the new treasurer. I called up the local PNC bank on Thursday to find out what I needed to do to transition the account over to the new treasurer. On the phone the nice gentleman told me that all I had to do was show up along with the new treasurer and sign a few papers. He said it would take five-ten minutes to do everything and I wouldn’t even need an appointment.

So today I get to the bank expecting this entire process to last a few minutes. I did get there a little early before the others and in order to expedite things, I went and sat down with the bank associate to start the process while the others were on their way. Since I had already turned over all of the documents, I did not have the account number, but told them it was for the Howard County Republican Club and he looked it up. Sure enough, it came up with my name and address on the account and it appeared everything was running smoothly.

Things are going along fine until he pulls up the signature card in the electronic file and asks if I am Mark or John. I said, no I am Dave. All of a sudden the bank associate claims that either John or Mark needs to be present in order to hand over the account. Now three years ago, I went through this same exact process and signed the signature card to give me access to this account from the previous President and treasurer who were Mark and John. As I mentioned before, I did not have the account books anymore, but I know before I handed it over that there was a copy of the signature card I signed in the book because I had just organized before handing it over. Yet PNC Bank had absolutely no record of this in their files and initially said there was nothing they could do since there was no record of my signature card in the file.

Now I am utterly confused since not only is the account in my name and my address, but also I have been writing checks against this account for the better part of three years, including a couple that were over $1,000, as well withdrawing money from the bank using my driver’s license. Not once was there every a problem with me taking money out of this bank. I ask how on earth the bank was approving these withdrawals if my signature is not on file as a legitimate. So I ask the obvious question to the bank associate. He goes thorugh entire explanation with the claim that the bank does not check signatures for checks unless they are cashed directly at a bank branch. All other checks are processed without checking signatures.I bring up the fact that I have withdrawn money directly from the bank tellers and he claims that should not have happened. I just laugh at this point at the absurdity of all of this. So despite the fact the account clearly has my name on it and my address, confirmed by my driver’s license, and that they have records of me writing checks from this account in their record showing my signature on those checks, I am told that the account can not be switched over to the new treasurer because they do not have my signature on file. He tells me I would have to go find the people listed on the signature card in order to switch the account over to the new treasurer. I tell him this is unacceptable and repeat that it seems utterly ridiculous that this bank is allowing someone (me) to write four-figure checks on an account without checking a signature on file.

Unfortunately while this is occurring, the new treasurer and president are already on their way and I was unable to catch either of them in time to make sure they brought the old account book that had a copy of the signature card I signed three years ago when the account was put in my name. They both showed up and now all three of us are talking with the bank associate trying to figure out how we are going to fix the bank’s screw up. The new treasurer, who had the account books at home, sent her husband back home to get it and bring it back to the bank in order to show the complete record of this account. The Bank Associate leaves to see what he can do on his end. As we are standing around waiting, the obvious point was made by one of us that we could easily write a check for the entire amount in the account in one of our names, have that person deposit the check in a separate account seeing that PNC Bank apparently does not check signatures, and be done with PNC for good. We chuckle, but I am sure the Bank Associate overheard us make this very obvious statement showing the giant loophole in their system and came right back out and said he was going to go ahead and let us switch over the account, saying that all the evidence shows I was clearly managing the account for the past three years and he now believes me that the signature card I signed must be missing.

Five minutes later, the paperwork was signed and the account was moved over to the new treasurer and president. However, since the new treasurer’s husband was on his way back, we decided to wait mostly so that I could pull out the signature card with my name on it and show the bank associate that I did in fact have a card showing me to be the rightful person to sign checks on the account. It arrived and I showed it to him. He looked at and had the same confusion as me why this record is not in their file. At a minimum, it at least gave him the confidence that the account transfer was legitimate and there was a record somewhere in PNC Bank’s files that I was the rightful owner of the account until today.

In the end, everything worked out and the account was transferred over with the help of the Bank Associate, but I am still absolutely perplexed by PNC Bank’s sloppiness and the fact that it was allowing me to write $1000 checks and withdraw money from this account despite having no record that I was permitted to withdraw money from this account. It did not give me a lot of confidence in the way banks operate, especially PNC Bank, with regards to making sure money being withdrawn from accounts is legitimate. i am hoping it is an isolated instance, but something tells me it is not.

Anyway, that is my rant for the day….

FL: Crist Would Win US Senate Seat

Saturday, January 31st, 2009

In addition to the new poll from Illinois one post down, Research 2000 also released a new poll for Daily Kos from the state of Florida for the open US Senate being vacated by Republican Mel Martinez. If the current Governor of Florida decides he wants it, the seat is his.

US SENATE – FLORIDA (Research 2000/Daily Kos)

Charlie Crist (R) 49%
Kendrick Meek (D) 28%

Kendrick Meek (D) 31%
Marco Rubio (R) 22%

Charlie Crist (R) 52%
Dan Gelber (D) 21%

Marco Rubio (R) 23%
Dan Gelber (D) 23%

The poll also included primary numbers for both races, however there were names included of people who declared they are no longer running making the numbers useless. Gelber is a state Senator from Florida, Rubio is the former Speaker of the House in Florida, and Meek is a current US Congressman. This poll was done January 26-28 among 600 likely voters.

Still a shame Jeb Bush wasn’t running as this seat could be his….

IL: Burris Leads In Race For Re-Election

Saturday, January 31st, 2009

The man who appointed him to the US Senate may have just been impeached and removed from office, but Democratic US Senator Roland Burris appears in a strong position to retain his seat in 2010, according to a new poll from Daily Kos/Research 2000.

US SENATE – ILLINOIS (R2000/Daily Kos)

Roland Burris (D-inc) 37%
Mark Kirk (R) 30%

Jan Schakowsky (D) 36%
Mark Kirk (R) 30%

Alexi Giannoulias (D-inc) 38%
Mark Kirk (R) 30%

Roland Burris (D-inc) 38%
Peter Roskam (R) 25%

Jan Schakowsky (D) 37%
Peter Roskam (R) 25%

Alexi Giannoulias (D-inc) 38%
Peter Roskam (R) 25%

In the primary battles,Burris holds a huge lead over the other Democrats while Kirk is moderately ahead of Roskam.

US SENATE – ILLINOIS – DEM PRIMARY (R2000/Daily Kos)
Burris 26%
Schakowsky 12%
Giannoulias 11%
Undecided 51%

US SENATE – ILLINOIS – DEM PRIMARY (R2000/Daily Kos)
Kirk 27%
Roskam 17%
Undecided 56%

Still a lot of undecideds however. This poll was done January 26-28 among 600 likely voters.

Class warfare in DC-Part II

Saturday, January 31st, 2009

As a special bonus I am updating the news today on the dividing line between the uppers and the lowers in DC.  Here is the 1st “upper” and that would be former Senator Tom Daschle.  Here is an article on Tom’s taxing travails.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/31/us/politics/31daschle.html?_r=1&hp

Tom as noted in the article took all sorts of free rides from lobbyists and investor friends.  Over the last three years Tom earned over $2 million dollars in consulting fees (his wife is also a big lobbyist with a huge income) but he neglected to pay taxes on his free rides.  Now normally Tom would be relegated to the bad place where evil tax evading lobbyists all go to now that Obama is President.  Yet Tom D. is a loyalist to Obama so he will get his cabinet spot.  Being a liberal democrat means you are always on the side of the “lowers” in the class war even if you are a literally  limousine liberal. 

 Thankfully to help clarify the issues in the class warfare struggle we have this bill from Senator McCaskill (D-MO).

http://www.kansascity.com/115/story/1009963.html

Yes this bill will require that any corporation taking TARP money will not pay any employee over 400K per year.  Basically the good senator says if Obama can get by on 400K anyone working at a TARP recipient company has to be limited to that amount.  I guess the +200 plus partners at Goldman Sachs will see huge cuts next year.  What a joke.

Basically the line in the sand has been drawn and some folks in DC want it drawn at 400K.  I wonder if Chuckie Schumer will go for this bill.  I guess Senator M. thinks its also insulting that anyone would earn more then President Obama.  Class envy is what I say.

Class warfare is breaking out all over in DC

Friday, January 30th, 2009

President Obama has declared war on Wall street bonuses.  Here Obama uses the “Shameful” word to decry the bonuses that Wall street folks received in 2008. 

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7862c580-ee70-11dd-b791-0000779fd2ac.html

I wonder whether the federal taxes paid on these bonuses were “shameful” as well. If so maybe the Federal government should refund this dirty money back to these hard working citizens.  I also wonder whether obama’s campaign will refund the millions of dollars in campaign donations that he received from these bonus babies??  No actually I think he wants to enlist them to help fund his 2012 re-election campaign.   Here are two  other points

1.  Many of these bonuses were not paid to Merrill Lynch or Morgan Stanley  employees.    Anyone can correct me, but these two wall street firms were the only ones who took TARP checks.  As far as I am concerned the other wall street firms can pay their employees anything they please. 

2.  This $18 billion dollars reported in 2008 may include bonuses paid on money earned in 2007.  That was a profitable year on wall street.  If you make money and you have committed to pay a bonus on it aren’t you as an employer obligated?  So where is the shame there?  In addition the state report cannot tell the difference between a 100K and a 100 million dollar bonus.  Many bonuses are quite modest.

Its bad enough to bash wall street bonuses but here is what Obama and Biden mean about “helping the middle class”.  Yup as I predicted helping the Middle class is all about helping the Unions.  Here’s this article

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/6238547.html

This is a pure D payback to the Unions for their help in the general election.  The Next step will be stacking the NLRB with pro Union hacks. 

Its “us” against “them” in DC now.  Wall streeters are grabbing bonuses and its Unions against employers.  Who’s side are you on?  The middle class workers or the greedy employers. 

MD: Cost Of Driving Just Went Up

Friday, January 30th, 2009

This is not a political story, but will affect a large number of people who rely on the EZ-Pass system to get around in Maryland and I am sure is an issue in many other states as well. The Baltimore Sun reports that the State of Maryland will now charge all those people it spent years convincing to sign up for EZ-Pass $18 a year just for the privilege of having the EZ-Pass, regardless of how often it is used. From The Baltimore Sun.

The Maryland Transportation Authority held a public meeting on its proposed fee increases for EZ-Pass use and truck tolls. MdTA board member Ronald L. Freeland, front, read the recommendations of the board from a prepared statement at the conclusion of the meeting, after which the authority voted to enact the increases.

Over vocal objections from the public, the Maryland Transportation Authority’s board voted this morning to raise truck tolls at its bridges and tunnels on Interstate 95 and to impose a $1.50-a-month fee on its EZ-Pass customers.

Since I have gotten EZ Pass, I can get a complete record of all the tolls I have paid driving up and down the East Coast over the past two years. In the two years I have had it, I have spent a grand total of $54.00 on tolls, or $27 per year. So does it make any sense to spend $18 for an EZ-Pass transponder on my car for $27 in tolls that I pay in a year. I would effectively be almost doubling the amount of money I pay in tolls just to have the EZ-Pass in my car.

If this money is truly needed, wouldn’t it be much more prudent to raise the tolls themselves so that people paying for the cost of the toll roads and EZ-Pass system are the people who actually use the toll roads and EZ-Pass system on a regular basis? If you use the toll booths on a daily basis, $18 is probably not a problem and barely a blip in the overall cost of going through tolls over a full year. But why punish people who may not use the toll roads as often by slapping an $18 charge on them? I am sure there is a simple way to determine the average number of trips through a toll booth in a month. Using that figure with the number of people with EZ-Passes, you could easily figure out the average rise in the tolls that would be needed to avoid charging everyone with EZ-Passes. And then the people paying for the cost of the system would be the people who actually use the system.

And don’t even get me started on the costs to our precious environment and additional contribution to “global warming” because of the extra carbon my car will be producing while I sit in the toll lanes to pay the tolls that would have been saved if I was able to keep my EZ-Pass for free….

So should I pay the $18 to keep my EZ-Pass?

Friday Morning update

Friday, January 30th, 2009

Slow political day after a flurry of activity in Springfield and DC  earlier this week.  I think the Gregg rumours are more about posturing then actual appointments.  Obama may be trying to snag a few votes for the stimulus package in DC.

Here’s an article in the WSJ from yesterday that really got my juices flowing

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123319134864127065.html

I have a lot of sympathy for Mr. and Mrs Smith as I do for all the other Americans who are facing financial hard times.  “There for the grace of God goes I” as the saying goes and for me its a heartfelt plea.  Yet there is one paragraph in this article which just shocks me as what can pass for common sense in America today.  The writer relates that the Smiths were, on their combined 180K annual salary, were not lavish spenders but they had accumulated 25K in credit card debt.

 Does this seem like common sense?  You earn 180K and still accumulate 25K in credit card debt?  Bless their hearts the Smiths with all their education, great jobs and obvious intelligence did not learn basic personal finance lessons.  Until Mr. Smith’s recent layoff apparently the word “No” was never used when it came to spending money.  One cannot under estimate the value of the word “No” or even “well maybe later or next month”.  That’s really the key to budget restrait at home or in the halls of government. 

Perhaps more later from me.

Two new Governors in a Week

Thursday, January 29th, 2009

Gov.  Blagojevich was impeached today by the state senate and Lt.  Gov Patrick Quinn  has been sworn in to replace him.  So congrats to the state of Illinois.  I suspect he will see primary oppisition next year. 

 Arizona without almost no fanfare or notice got a new governor when Janet Napolitano was sworn in as secratary of Homeland security.  AZSecretary of State Jan Drinkwine Brewer was sworn in as the New Governor. 

That’s right AZ does not have a LT Gov so the secretary of state moves and if she dies the AG moves up.  Don’t laugh I think the governor was impeached a number of years ago and the SOS moved and bless her heart she died.  Then AG Bruce Babbit became governor. 

Here in TN we do not have an elected Lt. Gov.  The President of the State senate (elected by the state senate) becomes the Lt. Gov.  Our governors are hardy folks here in TN and I can’t recall any of them ever dying in office.  NJ does not have a Lt Gov and actually no one becomes Gov if the elected governor dies or resigns.  They have an acting governor who is their state senate President.

Sorry for the rabbit trail diversion.  Gov. Brewer is popular and should win re-election. 

NY: Gillibrand Leads Giuliani By 2%

Thursday, January 29th, 2009

We get yet another poll from New York in the aftermath of Governor Paterson’s selection of Kirsten Gillibrand to replace Hillary in the US Senate. This time it is Siena College looking at potential match ups of Gillibrand with Republicans Rudy Giuliani and Peter King.

US SENATE – NEW YORK (Siena)
Kirsten Gillibrand (D-inc) 44%
Rudy Giuliani (R) 42%

Kirsten Gillibrand (D-inc) 46%
Peter King (R) 23%

Seems to me Giuliani would be better off running for Governor, but he did try to take on Hillary for the US Senate back in 2000 before backing out due to health reasons. This poll was done January 25-27 among 622 registered voters.

Thursday Mornng open thread

Thursday, January 29th, 2009

Here is the list of the eleven democrats who broke rank on the stimulus vote on Wednesday :  TN-Cooper, MS-Taylor, MN-Peterson, NC-Shuler, PA-Kanjorski, AL-Bright & Griffith, FL-Boyd, ID-Minnick, IN-Ellsworth and MD-Kratovil.  In a pinch several of these guys certainly would voted for the package.  Its a sad sign that Pelosi will have her will in the house over the next two years.

No saturday mail in the future?  Now that’s a cut that will bite?  Just a proposal right now.  There was some good discussion last night on food stamps and unemployment benefits.  Yes they are part of this stimulus package.  I did not mention them specifically in any of my three posts on the subject but they are in the package plus tons of other stuff

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/major-provisions-stimulus-package/story.aspx?guid=%7BCD0FF22B-F34A-4850-9265-1C07F5DC5A04%7D&dist=msr_18

The above list is just a partial breakdown.  I still see a rush to judgement on this bill.